点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
二十大将为世界提供中共治国理政最新样本******
(中共二十大·前瞻)二十大将为世界提供中共治国理政最新样本
中新社北京10月15日电 题：二十大将为世界提供中共治国理政最新样本
中新社记者 聂芝芯
中共二十大开幕之际，数千名境内外媒体记者云集北京，聚焦“二十大时间”。无疑，这次大会将是外界观察、研究中国的一个非常重要的机会窗口，以“举世瞩目”状之，绝非过言。中共二十大将制定中国未来5年乃至更长时期的发展方略，也将为世界提供中共治国理政的最新样本。
作为世界第二大经济体，中国已是世界经济的重要引擎，其经济表现关乎世界经济的走向。近十年来，中国经济年均增长率为6.6%，居世界主要经济体前列；中国对世界经济增长的平均贡献率超过30%。
资料图：忙碌的上海洋山深水港。 殷立勤 摄百年变局叠加世纪疫情，保护主义抬头，全球供应链遇阻，世界经济、中国经济面临的风险加大。在此境况下，中国如何化解压力、应对风险，保持经济稳定增长、推进改革开放，深受关注。中共二十大将为中国下一步经济发展提纲挈领，进一步增加确定性，回应外界的关切。
作为世界最大发展中国家，中国对国家富强和人民幸福的追求与努力，对不少国家具有参考意义。中共持续探索有别于西方的中国式现代化道路。至2021年建党百年，如期打赢脱贫攻坚战，创造人类减贫史奇迹，实现全面建成小康社会的第一个百年奋斗目标，迈上全面建设社会主义现代化国家新征程，向第二个百年奋斗目标进军。
资料图：航拍位于江西省上饶市广信区望仙乡的葛路梯田，依山而下的梯田及错落有致的民居相互衬托，呈现出一幅夏日田园美景。 刘占昆 摄中国对新征程规划了两步走：从2020年到2035年基本实现社会主义现代化，从2035年到本世纪中叶全面建成社会主义现代化强国。未来5年是全面建设社会主义现代化国家开局起步的关键时期。中共二十大将对“中国式现代化”进一步布局谋篇，动员全党全民奋楫笃行，也将为其他追求现代化的国家提供一份具有参考价值的样图。
作为一个大国和联合国安理会常任理事国，中国无疑是维护世界和平与发展的重要力量。当前，世界正处百年变局，进入新的动荡变革期，冷战思维复燃，中国面临愈加复杂的外部环境。中国如何走好和平发展道路，开展中国特色大国外交，推动建设新型国际关系，自然是国际社会一大关切。
近十年来，从“一带一路”倡议到全球发展倡议、全球安全倡议，从气候问题解决方案、构建地球生命共同体到全球疫苗合作行动倡议，从提出人类命运共同体愿景到阐释全人类共同价值，中国在消除国际社会发展赤字、和平赤字、信任赤字、治理赤字，完善全球治理体系中发挥关键作用，提供“中国方案”。中共二十大将对全球治理议题提出中国的思考和呼吁。
二十大前夕，一组印着“中国建造”地标的外国纸币图案在社交平台上传播，得到外国网民点赞。这是当下中国与世界紧密相连的一个缩影。由是观之，中共二十大擘画的治国理政新方略，将成为国际政界、学界、业界细心研究的重要新样本。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)