股票“兔”飞猛进,名字起对了就能涨?******
文/陈康亮
兔宝宝(002043)还在涨。
尽管有媒体提示风险以及高管减持等负面信息,但截至1月16日收盘,兔宝宝当天仍上涨近4%,今年以来兔宝宝已累计上涨近60%,成为2023年开年“妖股”之一。
兔宝宝是谁?
公开资料显示,兔宝宝身处家居行业,主营装饰材料和定制家居业务,是国内高端环保家具板材产销规模最大的企业之一。公司2005年上市,主要产品为装饰板材、科技木、地板、胶粘剂、原木、木门、定制衣柜、橱柜等。财报显示,装饰材料业务贡献其营收占比逾七成,为公司的“现金奶牛”业务,而定制家居业务营收占比逾两成。
兔宝宝的发展和房地产景气度可以说息息相关。近年来,房地产遭遇下行压力,身处房地产产业链上家居建材板块的兔宝宝业绩亦承压下行。2022年前三季度,公司营收和归母净利润分别为58.73亿元、3.89亿元,同比分别下滑7%、25.63%。兴业证券研报表示,公司业绩下滑源于华东区域受疫情冲击叠加国内房地产行业持续低迷。
回顾兔宝宝本轮上涨行情,令人费解。兔宝宝股价由去年11月初开始反弹,股价低点实际上与房地产行业预期整体向好的转变有关,兔宝宝股价的低点与万得资讯(Wind)房地产行业指数低点基本一致。但兔宝宝股价与房地产指数一致的趋势仅仅持续了一个月,到去年12月初,两者之间走势呈现明显分化,兔宝宝股价并未伴随房地产指数调整而调整。到了今年,其股价更是形成了凌厉上涨趋势。
在此前的股价异常波动公告当中,兔宝宝称未发现有近期公共传媒报道了可能或已经对本公司股票交易价格产生较大影响的未公开重大信息,近期公司经营情况及内外部经营环境也未发生重大变化。
分析认为,兔宝宝近期的大涨,或许与其股票名称有关。在农历兔年即将到来,作为A股唯一股票名称含“兔”字的标的股,兔宝宝获得了游资青睐,成为炒作标的。
有媒体发文称,从兔宝宝这几日股价走势来看,符合游资短线炒作的风格。游资通过“击鼓传花”等方式短线炒作后离场,散户则往往成为不明真相的“吃瓜群众”和“接盘侠”。
那些年A股炒过的“兔宝宝”
业绩不佳仍然挡不住兔年炒作兔宝宝,这让人不禁想起A股所谓的“股票姓名学”:名字起对了,可能带来意想不到的行情。
事实上,上述生肖炒作中,兔宝宝并非孤例。以往农历年前A股也都会有一波生肖行情。诸如湖北广电(谐音虎)、金牛化工(带有牛字)、联环药业(老鼠药概念)等,都曾在当年生肖行情中,经历了一轮股价上涨,多数个股股价短期翻倍。
2022年2月8日,当谷爱凌为中国队拿下北京冬奥会上的第三枚金牌时,A股名字里面带“谷”字的股票纷纷出现不同程度上涨。其中,远望谷股价冲上涨停板,股价创下近半年内新高。
美总统大选期间,A股部分公司股价也因名称而出现异动。2008年奥巴马美国大选前后,澳柯玛多次涨停;2012年奥巴马连任,澳柯玛再次涨停。2016年,由于特朗普(川普)当选美国总统,川大智胜涨停。此外,一个诗和远方(SHYF)的段子让石化油服(SHYF)大涨,电视剧《欢乐颂》一句要收购红星集团让红星发展大涨……
上述公司的上涨可能是股票名称“无心插柳”而获得的意外之喜,但由于A股存在上述炒作之风,部分公司亦处心积虑通过“更名”来蹭热点。
最有名的可能当属多伦股份改名为“匹凸匹”。2015年P2P互联网金融概念正火热,多伦股份于当年5月发布更名公告,随后受到资金热捧,股份股价连续6日涨停,涨幅为77.37%。
然而,经证监会调查,此次更名事件背后是多伦股份的实际控制人鲜言实施的证券市场操纵行为。中国证监会在2017年3月对鲜言开出34亿元的史上最大个人罚单。2020年12月,上海市高级人民法院判决鲜言构成操纵证券市场罪,对其处以有期徒刑3年4个月,罚金1000万元并追缴违法所得。
武汉科技大学金融证券研究所所长董登新在接受中新社国是直通车记者采访时表示,这种“追名逐利”的概念炒作行为属于市场噪声,往往属于短期行情,投资者应该保持清醒,不要盲目跟风。
中国人民大学财政金融学院教授赵锡军在接受中新社国是直通车记者采访时表示,炒作概念等投机行为任何市场都会有,但A股市场由于个人投资者占比偏多,市场相对不成熟,因此投机炒作事件时有发生。但随着中国资本市场逐渐进入高质量发展新阶段,A股投资价值也将不断凸显。不管是哪个板块的概念股,最终还是要回归基本面。
对于上市公司来说,要脚踏实地、立足主业谋发展。对于投资者而言,不要参与操纵市场等违法违规行为,不要盲目跟风,要看清炒作背后是否有真实投资价值,进行理性投资。
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() |